In the compact SUV segment, rivals are fighting in hopes of reaching the same level of success as the Toyota RAV4 and the Honda CR-V, the two top sellers in Canada. As Nissan’s most popular SUV Large Sport Sedans. Compare the 2024 Subaru Forester with the 2023 Subaru Forester: car rankings, scores, prices and specs. Price and features. The Subaru Forester Hybrid S comes in at $45,990 before on-road costs. It's covered by Subaru's five year/unlimited km warranty. There is also an eight year/160,000 high voltage battery warranty. Servicing is required every 12 months/15,000 km and there is a five year capped servicing program. 2021 Subaru Forester. Base Price: $25,845 / Read our 2021 Subaru Forester Review. What we like: Attractive price, EyeSight safety, and driver assists, standard AWD. What we would change: Better CVT response, more rugged styling, add a more powerful turbo engine option. Overview: After its recent redesign, the Subaru Forester comes across as a Despite lugging around an extra 374 lb (170 kg) of weight, it’s more agile and rides softer than the Forester, smoothing over all but the worst bumps in the road. The Outback handles like a car 2024 Subaru Crosstrek. Select configuration: CVT. $24,995. Starting Price (MSRP) 8.3. Subaru Crosstrek For Sale Subaru Crosstrek Full Review Subaru Crosstrek Trims Comparison. Change Vehicle. . GeneralOther Names: Also called: -- Also called: -- 2019 Nissan Qashqai first drive review Nissan Qashqai (Rogue Sport) 2018 SUV in-depth review 2018 Nissan Qashqai DIG-T N-Connecta 4x2 - Kaufberatung, Test, Review Nissan Qashqai vs. Skoda Yeti - Occasion Dubbeltest 2020 Nissan Qashqai review – still the best family SUV? | What Car? NEW Nissan Qashqai 2021 review – RUINED? CRASH TEST 2014 Nissan Qashqai 2017 Nissan Qashqai Features Options test drive and Review 2022 Subaru Forester SUV review 2020 Subaru Forester Review | A Few Important Changes The 2022 Subaru Forester Wilderness Is A Uniquely Rugged Compact SUV 2017 Subaru Forester | CarGurus Test Drive Review Transmission: Continuously Variable-speed AutomaticContinuously Variable-speed AutomaticExpert ReviewsExpert reviews: The facelifted 2018 Qashqai gets a fresh look, more kit and new tech. It's a good thing, but is it a standout option in the small SUV segment? Pros Still looks smart Above-average cabin practicality Improved on-road refinement Good cabin build quality AEB now standard across the range Cons It's pretty expensive Can feel underpowered Key active safety reserved for top models Ti, adaptive cruise not here until mid-2018 Tyre roar, busy ride on 19-inch wheels Still no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto Pros Spacious interior for size Addition of AEB Good comfort equipment list Cons Aggressive tyre choice spoils ride Space saver spare tyre No Apple Carplay or Android Auto The 2018 Subaru Forester ranked #5 in Compact SUVs. Currently the Subaru Forester has a score of out of 10 which is based on our evaluation of 36 pieces of research and data elements using various sources. Pros Excellent cargo capacity Spacious rear seats Good mpg ratings, even with standard all-wheel drive Many available safety features Cons Interior design and build quality trail some rivals' Fewer tech features than rivals The 2018 Subaru Forester continues to offer top safety scores, remarkable space inside, and all-round versatility; it’s still one of the best small SUVs, and a good value for money. Pros Fun to drive, good ride Excellent safety ratings and systems Good outward visibility Standard all-wheel drive Peppy Turbo option, CVT among the best Cons Front seats small for some Priciest trims still not that premium No manual gearbox for turbo engine Paddle shifters only on turbo For 2018, the Subaru Forester offers a new Black Edition trim package that adds black-finished wheels, body trim and grille. The interior also receives black cloth upholstery and black gloss dashboard trim. Limited trim levels also get a new cargo area cover, while Touring trims now include Subaru's EyeSight safety package as standard along with automatic high beams and reverse automatic braking. PROS All-wheel drive comes standard and doesn't sink fuel economy High ground clearance offers better than average off-road ability Airy interior with plenty of room for adults both front and rear Optional turbocharged engine makes Forester very quick CONS Modest tow rating limits overall utility Cabin design and materials are just average Handling isn't as sporty as some rivals CVT feels less responsive and refined than a traditional automatic FuelFuel Economy Info: Urban/Extra Urban Mpg UK( and PerformanceEngine Size/Displacement: Cam Type: Double overhead cam (DOHC)Double overhead cam (DOHC)ConvenienceTelescopic steering wheel: On steering wheel: Audio and cruise controls on steering wheelAudio and cruise controls on steering wheelMore in Convenience: Electric speed sensitive power steeringLights On' warning buzzerExterior DimensionsInterior DimensionsWeights and capacitesMaximum Towing Capacity un-break: Cargo Capacity with Seats in Place: InstrumentsExternal Temperature Display: More Instruments: interior lighting (front map light and two rear lights) Advanced Drive Assist Display (ADAD)nstant & Average Fuel economy meter (in drive computer), distance to empty, average speedPower FeaturesMore Power Features: Rear view mirror with auto Anti-DazzleFront sun visors with vanity mirrors2 one-touch power windowsSeatsFront Seats Features: Driver’s seat lumbar supportLeather accented^ seat trim6-way power adjustable driver seat with slide/ reclining/height adjust & manual lumbar adjustmentFront passenger seat with manual slide/reclineAdjustable front headrests with 1-way adjustmentFront passenger assist grip2 Cup holders - front centre consoleDriver’s seat lumbar supportDriver and front passenger seat back pocketsHeight adjustable passenger seatHeight adjustable driver seatDriver seat with power adjustable lumbar support4-Way Manual Passenger Seat AdjustmentMulti-Level Heating Driver SeatMulti-Level Heating Passenger SeatRear Seats Features: Second row centre armrest60/40 split second row seatingAdjustable rear headrests with 1-way adjustmentRear passenger assist grip 2Split-folding rear seatbackSuspensionFront Suspension: Independent Front SuspensionRear Suspension: multi link Rear SuspensionSuspension Info: Four-wheel independent suspensionComfortMore Comfort Features: Ambient interior lightingConfigurable cargo systemChrome inside door handlesInterior trim finish - premium Piano BlackRear cargo area luggage hooks (4)Dual illuminating vanity mirrorsEntertainmentMore Entertainment: Single CD player with MP3 capabilityBluetooth® handsfree phone systemAuxiliary audio input and USB with external media controlExterior FeaturesMore in Glass and Roof: Door mirrors with power adjustmentDoor mirrors with power foldingHeated outside door mirrorsPrivacy glass (2nd row, and rear)Mudflaps (Front and Rear)Variable intermittent wipersWheels more: Inside mounted spare tireSafety FeaturesDual front side-mounted airbags: Emergency braking assist: Front brakes: Front ventilated disc brakesFront ventilated disc brakesRear brakes: rear ventilated disc brakesRear door child safety locks: Auto delay off headlamps: Tire pressure monitoring: More Safety Features: Electronic Brake Force Distribution (EBD) The Japanese crossover isn’t just the Toyota RAV4 or Nissan Qashqai. There are at least CR-V from Honda and Forester from Subaru. Which are noticeably inferior to the bestsellers in mass production, but not in consumer qualities. Quite often, the opposite is is Better for Passengers: “Subaru Forester” or “Honda SRV.”In some ways, the rivals are undoubtedly similar. For example, being cars of the early “tenths”, they completely ignore all the ” tenths ” achievements and acquisitions. The motors are atmospheric, the boxes are old-school (a typical automatic or variator), the interiors are rag or leather (without this newfangled Alcantara), the plastic is hard and general, not a Tiguan, not a Peugeot 3008, or even a KIA Sportage. Very old-fashioned “wardrobes”, but with their own charisma and example, they are useful as family travel cars. Of course, there are only five places for a brother; the point being, they will not fit large families. But in the five available places, everyone will have enough: both legroom and air supply overhead. CR-V is perfect in this sense: the sofa there is just are of geometrically-correct rectangular shape for any belongings. Especially in the Honda CR-V: 589 liters versus the “Subar” 488 liters! But 488 liters with a length of meters is also a good result: the car is still relatively compact, and there was a place for half a thousand liters of in Subaru, there was no place for either design or performance of the interior. It looks like it’s still the late 80s in the yard: plastic is like cheap vinyl, leather on chairs is like a soldier’s tarpaulin from CR-V is also not so handsome, but with contrasting colors, various textures make the interior visually more affluent. A decent media system monitor and spectacular dashboard illumination make you want to sit here longer, unlike the Subaru a matter of taste, of course, but the Forester looks like its audience is people who don’t care what to drive at all:There is a steering are seats, four-wheel ground clearance is two salon will do just fine, tea, not for a beauty contest with him to is Better for the Driver: Honda CRV or Subaru ForesterAs for the ride, you shouldn’t expect pleasant surprises. The most famous “Foresters”, for example, are atmospheric two-liter. And their seconds up to the first hundred looks and feels frankly pitiful. But exactly until you look and ride on the two-liter CR-V, which is an infinite second this gap persists with older engines: the Forester with liters still somehow goes from 10 seconds to the first hundred, and the CR-V is beyond its power – its “record” is someone claims that this is strictly a family car with no endurance for the thrill – there is someone to return to the discussion after seconds of protracted toad terms of behavior on the road, cars differ in the same way as in dynamics: the unhurried and loose CR-V is for those who like not to feel any bumps. As, however, and to steer: Honda does not encourage active driving at IV generation, too: it moved far away from its more glorious ancestors. If on the first and second “Foriks”, I still wanted to pile up faster in turn, then on the fourth, I didn’t want to. But against the background of “Honda”, it is just exemplary: it drives more precisely and listens sharper than this steering wheel. And it does not roll as profoundly as the CR-V, which, coupled with more agile acceleration dynamics, makes it preferable for those who are still (relatively) young at is More Expensive to Maintain: “Forester” or “CRV”.Contrary to the legends about “real Japanese quality”, Subaru owners are frequent guests in services. And oil is added almost more often than VAGs. It is also necessary to carry fuel and lubricants with you in reserve in the case of the fourth “Forik”: two-liter engines have a small crankcase, oil starvation is not uncommon, so the level must be monitored and monitored. You need to add until the fourth cylinder knocks, or even the entire engine has not asked for capital in case of a aspirated has another problem: a small gap between the cylinders is fraught with overheating. Hence, you also need to monitor the engine temperature and do not forget about the coolant Foresters’ suspension is quite durable, from regular replacements:stabilizer struts (~ $12 apiece);and wheel bearings (assembled with a hub – ~ $80 apiece).In some reviews, complaints about the steering rack are heard, but this sore either manifests itself or not, depending on the operating conditions. The rake knocks for those who regularly make excursions to nature on primers. It is possible to drive 150-200 thousand km without extraneous sounds and knocks in other has a surprisingly good CVT. You don’t hear such complaints about the Renault-Nissan unit: up to 150 thousand km you should walk without any questions at all. The main thing is to observe the oil change interval of 40-50 thousand against the background of “Honda”, Subaru will be more expensive in service – at least because of the specifics of the boxer engines. There, just to replace the spark plugs, you need to disassemble half of the car, remove the intake manifold, washer reservoir, battery, is Better to Buy: Honda CRV or Subaru Forester?The Honda CR-V is more straightforward, more maintainable, and ultimately cheaper to maintain. There is no need to expect surprises from ordinary, careful handling:Just remember the Honda CRV SUV requires the following:Clean the throttle the valves every 40-50 thousand the timing chain when characteristic vibrations speaking, these cars were not taught to can only find complaints about sagging rear springs and knocking off the same steering rack as the owners’ complaints. But it is impossible to say that this is some kind of universal story: everything, as always, rests on operating modes and accuracy of for a leisurely but equally unproblematic life, it is definitely worth buying the CR-V. Yes, it is slow and, in general, has already succeeded everywhere, but he has a more spacious rear sofa, a larger trunk, and it will require much less attention to maintain it. Looks and convenience in one, what more could one ask for! Compare two cars 2007. - 2010. J - SUV suv, 5 door front Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2005. - 2008. J - SUV suv, 5 door 4 x 4 Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2007 Nissan Qashqai 2005 Subaru Forester © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 4 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 4 - Boxer, 4 valves per cylinder Nat. Asp. Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Two significantly similar cars, no doubt about that. Still, each one has something different to offer. Having both cars powered by petrol engines and utilizing the 5-door suv body style within the same 'SUV' segment, the only major difference here really is their wheel drive configuration (front for the Nissan and 4 x 4 in the case of the Subaru). The first one has a Nissan-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 117hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 162hp engine designed by Subaru. Safety The fact that the Nissan got tested by the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), while the other contender didn't, puts it sky-high safety-wise, in my eyes at least. Still, apart from the official crash test results there are other things we need to be aware of. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, Forester offers a marginal difference of 7% more metal. Reliability Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that Nissan does have a slight advantage, all the models observed together. That's the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of Nissan with an average rating of and models under the Subaru badge with out of 5. Independent research findings rank Qashqai as average reliability-wise, and Forester is more or less at the same should definitely mention that owners of cars with the same powertrain as Qashqai rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Subaru is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 197 kilometers per hour, 22km/h more than the other car. When it comes to fuel economy an obvious choice would be Qashqai, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (42 mpg), in combined cycle. That's 39% difference compared to Forester! Verdict Nissan appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, Qashqai beats the other contender by far, making it the best choice without even considering other things. From there things take a different direction, with Subaru being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... All together, there's not much more to say, in this case I wouldn't even consider anything but Nissan. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles. Check a car by its VIN number Subaru nie byłoby sobą, gdyby nie wyposażyło Forestera w swój znak firmowy - stały, symetryczny napęd czterech kół. To najbardziej skomplikowany układ w porównaniu z konkurentami, wyposażony w blokady centralnego i tylnego dyferencjału. Ponadto, Subaru jako jedyne oferuje reduktor przełożenia skrzyni biegów. W warunkach dobrej przyczepności moment obrotowy wędruje na obie osie w proporcji 50:50. Co innego, gdy któreś z kół natrafi na śliską nawierzchni ę - wtedy proporcje zmieniają się na 67:33% lub 33:67% (przód/tył). Qashqai i Octavia to typowe pojazdy przednionapędowe z dołączanym napędem na tylną oś. W pierwszym z nich pracuje, znany z Nissana X-Traila, elektronicznie sterowany układ, w którym za przenoszenie momentu obrotowego na tył odpowiedzialne jest sprzęgło wielopłytkowe. Na tunelu środkowym wyrasta pokrętło, służące zmianie rodzaju napędu. Kierowca ma do wyboru trzy tryby pracy: napęd na przód, automatyczne dołączanie napędu na tylną oś poprzez blokowanie sprzęgła, w momencie wystąpienia różnicy obrotów między kołami przednimi i tylnymi, albo zblokowanie sprzęgła na stałe, powodujące rozdział momentu obrotowego po 50 procent na każdą oś. W przypadku Octavii Scout kierowca zdany jest wyłącznie na możliwości elektronicznie sterowanego sprzęgła wielopłytkowego typu Haldex (drugiej generacji), które współpracuje z systemami wspomagania kierowcy w czasie jazdy. Wystarczy, że jedno z kół uślizgnie się tylko o 10 stopni, by sprzęgło skierowało moment obrotowy na tylne koła, do proporcji 50:50 procent (przód/tył). Przy hamowaniu Haldex się rozłącza. Tyle teorii. Czas wyruszyć w teren. Na pierwszy ogień idzie Skoda. Piaszczysta droga rozpoczyna się długą prostą, potem - mocne hamowanie, ostry skręt w lewo, kilka łuków, nawrót w lewo i ostry podjazd. Tuż po ruszeniu z miejsca przednie koła od razu tracą przyczepność, ale tył dołącza się w okamgnieniu. Dwulitrowy FSI o mocy 150 KM do roboty zabiera się ochoczo już od niskich obrotów, w czym zasługa także sześciobiegowej przekładni. Auto rozpędza się prawie do 80 km/h, po drodze pokonując kilka większych nierówności, które zawieszenie pewnie tłumi, nie pozwalając karoserii na wzdłużne bujanie. Hamowanie, ostry skręt i gaz. Układ kierowniczy Octavii jest najprecyzyjniejszy. Prawdziwy sprawdzian zaczyna się wraz z dotarciem do podjazdu. Stromy początek rodzi wyraźne obawy o przedni zderzak, który mocno wystaje do przodu. Po upewnieniu się, że można, ruszam powoli. Na początku, gdy auto ciągną tylko przednie koła, wyraźnie brakuje mu pary i trzeba wspierać się sprzęgłem, co może doprowadzić do jego spalenia. Przy pierwszym ich uślizgu, dołącza się tył i Skoda wjeżdża pod górę, ale nie bez trudu. Pod koniec zjazdu - pojawia się ten sam problem, co przy podjeździe. I tym razem przedni zderzak uchodzi cało. Przesiadka do Subaru. Najmocniejszy w porównaniu silnik (typu bokser), o mocy 158 KM, brzmi rasowo, ale dopiero od około 3000 obr/min następuje wyraźny przyrost momentu obrotowego. Forester jako jedyny ma skrzynię biegów o pięciu przełożeniach i pozbawiony jest układu ESP. Już w czasie startu można docenić działanie stałego napędu na cztery koła. Te same ewolucje na tej samej trasie Subaru wykonuje lepiej od Skody. Nierówności nawierzchni od razu są tłumione przez miękko zaprogramowane amortyzatory i sprężyny, jazda zaś w zakrętach na sypkiej nawierzchni daje tyle przyjemności, co oglądanie Naomi Campbell w stroju kąpielowym. Na dodatek, zachowanie Forestera, inaczej niż czarnoskórej modelki, jest dużo bardziej przewidywalne. Ten sam podjazd pod górę nie nastręcza autu żadnego problemu - z miejsca widać, że Subaru zniesie o wiele więcej, i to bez sięgania do reduktora. W Qashqaiu od razu warto załączyć tryb Lock. Zblokowany napęd 4x4 sprawia, że auto już na pierwszych metrach trasy ma lepszą trakcję niż Octavia Scout. Na tych samych nierównościach poprzecznych nie prowadzi się już tak pewnie jak ta ostatnia, o Subaru nie wspominając. "Japończyk" zamiast tłumić pofałdowania nawierzchni, zachowuje się niczym kangur, starający się je przeskoczyć. Układ kierowniczy Qashqaia, ze względu na wspomaganie o zbyt mocnej progresji, najgorzej przekazuje informacje o tym, co się dzieje z przednimi kołami, ale jest bezpośredni. Na co go stać, Nissan pokazuje w czasie stromego podjazdu, na którym Octavię pozostawia daleko z tyłu. Najsłabszy w tym gronie, 141- -konny silnik Nissana swoją moc rozwija bardzo harmonijnie już od niskich obrotów, ale i tak ustępuje Skodzie. Także do współpracy z nim zaprzęgnięto sześciobiegową skrzynię było do przewidzenia - w terenie najszybciej daje za wygraną Octavia Scout, drugi (w połowie drogi za Subaru) jest Qashqai, a najbardziej terenowe okazuje się Subaru. Na asfalcie prowadzi się ono jak po szynach (stały napęd na 4 koła), ale w zakrętach przejeżdżanych na granicy możliwości mocno zamiata tyłem i ma najsłabsze hamulce. Octavia - najniższa - na asfalcie jeździ najpewniej i prowadzi się najprecyzyjniej. Jej nadwozie mocno w pionie trzymają pokaźne stabilizatory, a Haldex wkracza do akcji bardzo płynnie. Na dodatek, z kręgosłupami pasażerów obchodzi się najlepiej. Nissan prowadzi się dobrze, ale w szybkich łukach przechyla się mocniej od czeskiego konkurenta. Nierówności nawierzchni amortyzuje jednak najgorzej; za to ma świetne hamulce. Mimo że starają się jak mogą, oba crossovery w terenie dostają zadyszki szybciej od SUV-a. Tekst: Maciej StrukZdjęcia: Jan Dvoracek Berita Terkait Subaru ForesterSubaru Indonesia lakukan seremoni penyerahan 10 unit pertama Subaru Forester. Subaru Forester 2022 meluncur 18 Mei 2022 lalu. Subaru Forester adalah model pertama yang diluncurkan oleh agen pemegang merek baru Subaru di IndonesiaSubaru Indonesia yang kali ini dipegang PT Plaza Auto Mega melakukan seremoni penyerahan 10 unit Subaru Forester 2022 ke konsumen. SUV baru tersebut merupakan produk pertama yang diluncurkan oleh agen pemegang baru, sejak merek itu hengkang pada 2013-2014 terkendala kasuSetelah lama dinanti-nanti, pada akhirnya PT Plaza Auto Mega memperkenalkan Subaru Forester 2022 di Tanah Air. Sebagai generasi kelimanya, tipe teratasnya Forester EyeSight dibandrol Rp659,5 juta OTR artinya, SUV berlogo enam bintang jenama Negeri Matahari tersebut dibandrol lebih mahal Rp8,1 juta dari Honda CR-V Prestige Turbo yang menurut situs resminya kini diniagakan Rp651,4 harga baru lebih mahal, apakah Subaru Forester bisa ungguli Honda CR-V dari segi spUntuk pasar Indonesia, PT Plaza Auto Mega menawarkan Subaru Forester dengan dua varian, yakni dan EyeSight. Bermain di segmen SUV 5-seater, untuk harganya model diniagakan juta, sedangkan EyeSight yang ditawarkan Rp659,5 juta OTR artinya, untuk kedua varian Subaru Forester 2022 memiliki perbedaan harga mencapai Rp80 juta. Mempunyai selisih harga baru yang terbilang sangat banyak, apa sih bedanya Forester dan EyeSight? Daripada penasarSubaru yang diwakili oleh PT Plaza Auto Mega baru saja memperkenalkan secara resmi the all-new Subaru Forester. SUV 5-seater ini hadir dengan spesifikasi mumpuni untuk medan off road, karena pakai penggerak AWD. Sosok Subaru Forester ini pun mendapat banyak rival, salah satunya Toyota Corolla Subaru Forester diperkenalkan dengan 2 varian trim, yaitu Subaru Forester yang ditawarkan dengan harga Rp. (on-the-road Jakarta) dan Subaru Forester EyeSight ditawa Yongki Sanjaya Baca Lebih Subaru XV 2022 sudah rilis di Malaysia Desember 2021. Disana harganya Rp468 juta hingga Rp491 juta. Jika masuk Indonesia, Subaru XV akan jadi rival Honda HR-V, Toyota CH-R dan Mazda Forester 2022 resmi menandai bangkitnya kembali Subaru di Indonesia. Setelah ditinggal APM sebelumnya Motor Image, kini Subaru berada di bawah naungan PT Plaza Auto Subaru Indonesia tak selesai sampai di Forester. Ada deretan model Subaru global lain yang juga sedang dipertimbangkan untuk m

nissan qashqai vs subaru forester